<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Y2Kers &#187; Dove</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.y2kers.com/tag/dove/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.y2kers.com</link>
	<description>News for the Y2Kers - Coast to Coast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:45:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<copyright>2006-2007 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>cpostier@gmail.com (Y2Kers)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>cpostier@gmail.com (Y2Kers)</webMaster>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>News for the Y2Kers - Coast to Coast</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Y2Kers</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Y2Kers</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>cpostier@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Update: Dove Fake Beauties are not Fake</title>
		<link>http://www.y2kers.com/2008/05/update-dove-fake-beauties-are-not-fake/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=update-dove-fake-beauties-are-not-fake</link>
		<comments>http://www.y2kers.com/2008/05/update-dove-fake-beauties-are-not-fake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashley St. Standard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dove Campaign for Real Beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-Age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.y2kers.com/?p=446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: The Dove Fake Beauty story was well, a fake. Turns out, the ad agency who created the campaign is fessing-up , but only to simple color correction and film dust removal retouching on the Pro-Age product ads. They maintain that there was still no retouching on &#8220;big girls in undies&#8221; &#8220;Real Beauty&#8221; Ads. They say only the old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/naked.jpg"></a><strong><br />
<img class="size-full wp-image-447 alignright" src="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/naked.jpg" alt="" width="247" height="178" /><br />
Update:</strong> The <a href="http://www.y2kers.com/2008/05/doves-real-beauties-are-fake/" target="_blank">Dove Fake Beauty story </a>was well, a fake. Turns out, the ad agency who created the campaign is <a href="http://adage.com/article.php?article_id=126945" target="_blank">fessing-up </a>, but only to simple color correction and film dust removal retouching on the <a href="http://www.doveproage.com/" target="_blank">Pro-Age </a>product ads. They maintain that there was still no retouching on &#8220;<a href="http://www.dove.us/#/CFRB/arti_CFRB.aspx[cp-documentid=7049725]/" target="_blank">big girls in undies&#8221;</a> &#8220;Real Beauty&#8221; Ads. They say only the old ladies in the Pro-Age ads who posed in the nude were retouched (insert creepy joke here). Statements were apparently <span style="underline;"><strong>taken out</strong></span> of context.</p>
<p>Yeah, just like the cellulite and wrinkles were <span style="underline;"><strong>taken out</strong></span> of the photos . . .</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Update%3A+Dove+Fake+Beauties+are+not+Fake+http%3A%2F%2Fy2kers.com%2F%3Fp%3D446" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Update%3A+Dove+Fake+Beauties+are+not+Fake+http%3A%2F%2Fy2kers.com%2F%3Fp%3D446" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.y2kers.com/2008/05/update-dove-fake-beauties-are-not-fake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dove&#8217;s &#8220;Real&#8221; Beauties are FAKE!</title>
		<link>http://www.y2kers.com/2008/05/doves-real-beauties-are-fake/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=doves-real-beauties-are-fake</link>
		<comments>http://www.y2kers.com/2008/05/doves-real-beauties-are-fake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashley St. Standard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beauty News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Real Beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Retouching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dove Bodywash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[For Sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gisele Bundchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlett Johannsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.y2kers.com/?p=404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A retoucher, Pascal Dangin of New York&#8217;s Box Studios, was recently quoted in an article for The New Yorker saying he retouched the photos in Dove&#8217;s Campaign for Real Beauty: “Do you know how much retouching was on that?” he asked. “But it was great to do, a challenge, to keep everyone’s skin and faces [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fat.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fatte.jpg"></a>A retoucher, <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/05/12/080512fa_fact_collins?currentPage=1">Pascal Dangin of New York&#8217;s Box Studios, was recently quoted </a>in an article for The New Yorker saying he retouched the photos in <a href="http://www.campaignforrealbeauty.com/flat3.asp?id=2287" target="_blank">Dove&#8217;s Campaign for Real Beauty</a>:</p>
<p>“Do you know how much retouching was on that?” he asked. “But it was great to do, a challenge, to keep everyone’s skin and faces showing the mileage but not looking unattractive.” </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-409 aligncenter" src="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fatte.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="135" /></p>
<p>Dove&#8217;s ad agency spokesperson didn&#8217;t fess up to knowing about any of it:<br />
&#8220;There was no retouching of the women,&#8221; she said. &#8220;If there was a hair that was up in the air, that might have been the kind of retouching that was done. But until I know what he actually worked on, I can&#8217;t comment on it.&#8221; <a href="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fat.jpg"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-406" src="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fat-247x300.jpg" alt="" width="247" height="300" /></p>
<p>Will we hear a public outcry for this? Will the real &#8221;real&#8221; women speak out against Dove for misleading them? I mean, we already feel bad that we don&#8217;t have Gisele Bunchen&#8217;s butt or Scarlett Johansen&#8217;s boobs. But what happens when Dove, who&#8217;s supposed to be featuring our fellow sisters in flab, makes <span style="underline;">the ad&#8217;s subjects look </span>even better than us normal people? I predict &#8220;hit fitting the shan&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>I on the other hand am just making two notes to self:</strong><br />
#1-no cookies after lunch today<br />
#2 For important photos, hire Mr. Dangin. </p>
<p>Comments, thoughts?</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Dove%E2%80%99s+%E2%80%9CReal%E2%80%9D+Beauties+are+FAKE%21+http%3A%2F%2Fy2kers.com%2F%3Fp%3D404" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.y2kers.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Dove%E2%80%99s+%E2%80%9CReal%E2%80%9D+Beauties+are+FAKE%21+http%3A%2F%2Fy2kers.com%2F%3Fp%3D404" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.y2kers.com/2008/05/doves-real-beauties-are-fake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

